Canton Network: Comprehensive Guide on Digital Asset Custody and Blockchain Security

Webinar on Monday: Digital Asset Custody with Grayscale & Sygnum Bank →

Securing code integrity, protecting digital assets

Assessing protocols, securing blockchain foundations

Uncovering flaws, strengthening software integrity

Exposing weaknesses, fortifying digital defenses

Cloud Infrastructure Penetration Testing

Securing configurations, protecting critical environments

Simulating real-world attacks, strengthening defenses

Guiding secure, strategic AI adoption forward

From unknown threats to actionable insights

Optimizing architecture for tomorrow’s networks

Empower your teams to secure what matters

The best security engineers in the world

The trusted security advisor for blockchain and financial services industries

Access official logos, fonts, and guidelines

In-depth evaluations of smart contracts and blockchain infrastructures

All the latest vulnerabilities discovered by Halborn

How Halborn’s solutions have empowered clients to overcome security issues

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you've provided to them or that they've collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website. Learn More.

The Canton Network: A Comprehensive Guide

The Canton Network: A Comprehensive Guide

Digital Asset recently announced its plan to launch the Canton Network, which is anticipated to become a network of networks, based on the Daml smart contract platform and the Canton synchronization protocol . The announcement already contains a list of partners which plan to use and/or take part in the operation of the network, including (but not limited to) BNP Paribas, Capgemini, Deloitte, Goldman Sachs, and Microsoft.

Seeds of the Canton Network already exist: as they write, “as of early 2023, financial institutions transact over $50 billion daily on limited-access subnets of the Canton Network”. Canton Network participants are expected to begin testing interoperability capabilities across a range of applications and use cases in July.

In parallel with the announcement and launching of the Canton Network web site, Digital Asset has published a white paper under the title “ Canton Network: A Network of Networks for Smart Contract Applications ”.

An evaluation of some “current smart contract networks” in terms of privacy and scalability, as a justification of the value of the Canton Network.

A compact summary of basic, Daml and Canton related concepts already explained in depth in the Daml/Canton documentation . Additionally, an explanation is provided how the Daml ledger model is an essential enabler of decentralization and scalability.

A description of the Canton Network.

In this blog post, we will mainly focus on the third topic. The reason for this choice is that 1) the exposition of the first topic is a bit limited and serves as an explanation of the general thinking of the creators of Daml and Canton: they wanted to create a blockchain solution which has better privacy and scalability properties than its competitors 2) the second topic serves as a reminder of concepts which are probably familiar to many of Halborn readers (although we recommend reading also these sections because of the connections between the Daml ledger model vs decentralization and scalability). For the presentation of the third (and a little bit of the second) topic, we will highlight some key terms which in their general meaning are probably familiar to many readers, and explain what they mean in the current context.

The most famous “network of networks” is the Internet: it was born from connecting local computer networks. For those readers who are interested in the enterprise blockchain solutions, the Corda network can also come to mind: it is positioned as “a publicly-available internet of Corda nodes operated by network participants”.

In the context of the Canton Network concept, “network of networks” means the following:

A simple Canton network consists of potentially multiple participant nodes and a sync domain. The participant nodes act on behalf of ledger parties. The sync domain is basically a message queue between the participants, also providing sequencing and time stamping service.

Operators of participant nodes already currently can interact with other participant nodes if they connect to one or more common sync domains. Participants can choose which sync domain they want to use, and switch sync domains during operation.

The network of networks will be different from the collection of isolated private networks by the existence of at least one permissionless virtual (distributed) sync domain, operated by a group of independent companies called Super Validator Collective (or SVC ). The SVC will charge a fee to the users of the sync domain. Other companies can also operate private or public sync domains and charge a fee for their usage.

In general, a permissionless blockchain network like Bitcoin or Ethereum is such that anyone can join as a “miner”. In the context of the Canton Network, “permissionless network” means that anyone can operate private or public sync domains and charge a fee for their usage.

“Composition” here refers to the mathematical concept of function composition, namely performing an operation on the result of a previous operation. In the procedural programming paradigm, where side effects are not accounted for in the type system, function composition is problematic. The functional programming paradigm fixes this handicap so that side effects (like a ledger update in the case of Canton) and the atomic composition of functions with side effects is accounted for in the monad type class. That’s why it’s convenient that Daml is a functional programming language.

For the Daml ledger model, application composition is possible because the ledger stores an append-only array of transaction graphs (more specifically transaction trees). The graphs refer to their dependencies and contain their consequences or sub-transactions as sub-graphs. Each party sees and validates only the subtransactions they are stakeholder to, but each party’s ledger view is a valid ledger in itself. Atomic transaction composition is achieved by the fact that a transaction graph as a whole is either appended to the ledger or not, so it cannot happen that a transaction with multiple legs is committed partially.

In the context of the Canton Network, application composition means that Canton guarantees the atomicity of cross-subnet transactions, with the limitation that Canton allows cross-subnet transactions only whenever there exists at least one sync domain to which all transaction participants are connected.

Application composition makes it possible for parties to create higher-order workflows, including atomic transactions across multiple applications, processed via a sync domain selected by the applications.

In the blockchain world, there are several “proof-of-X” consensus mechanisms used like proof-of-work in Bitcoin or proof-of-stake in Ethereum . The Canton consensus protocol is called proof-of-stakeholder consensus . It seems that the goal here was to come up with an expression which is at the same time similar and different from the other “proof-of-X” expressions. The “proof-of-stakeholder” part can be interpreted so that every compound transaction is jointly validated by the stakeholders of its sub-transactions.

The Canton consensus protocol consists of two layers. The first layer of the consensus is a two-phase commit protocol that replicates each contract to the contract’s stakeholders in a similar way to the atomic commit protocols of sharded databases. (This is different from Bitcoin or Ethereum where the whole network state is replicated at every node.) The second